Bob Schwartz

Applicants can now become FBI agents after explaining how their committing bestiality was forced on them.

Senator John Kennedy questioned FBI Director Kash Patel about new FBI hiring policies.

Nothing short of the entire article from The Hill will do justice to the absurdity we now face as American citizens. Or as human beings.


GOP senator presses Patel on FBI policy change: ‘Why would you get into bestiality?’
by Rebecca Beitsch – 09/15/26

It’s not a topic often discussed in the halls of Congress, but Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) grilled FBI Director Kash Patel as he said he was just “trying to understand” a recent change in policy regarding bestiality.

The line of questioning on Tuesday was sparked by a shift in FBI hiring practices which lifted longtime bans on selecting new trainees if they have engaged in prostitution or bestiality.

The FBI has argued the changes were needed in order to not automatically disqualify a prospective agent who may have been forced into such scenarios through human trafficking.

But Kennedy said he was confused by the matter, asking on “what planet” this was suggested.

“We’re having a tough time attracting agents, good quality agents that we all can trust, because so many people, fairly or unfairly, think that in order to be an FBI agent now, your political point of view matters. Why would you even get into bestiality?” he asked.

“We are not into bestiality,” Patel responded with a slight smile.

Kennedy is known for adopting an unassuming posture during questioning that can be both effective and humorous.

“When you saw bestiality — I say this with respect to the person who recommended it — why didn’t you just say, ‘What planet did you parachute in from? Why do I want to lead with my chin and get into bestiality?’” Kennedy asked.

Patel acknowledged he had some reservations.

“That was my initial response, senator. But they then explained to me and showed me cases in which people were forced into it and had applied to the FBI, and so I thought they should be considered. It’s not an automatic disqualification. That’s all,” the director said.

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) earlier this week flagged concerns over the policy change, noting that the shift included not just animal cruelty, calling both “extreme conduct.”

“These are not minor technical adjustments. They represent a considered decision to open the Bureau’s ranks to individuals who engaged in conduct that the FBI previously treated as disqualifying,” he wrote, noting that the shift in allowing those who had hired prostitutes comes from an agency designated to battle human trafficking.

Kennedy throughout the exchange had queries on the specifics.

“So… it’s not if you frequented a prostitute. It’s if you were a prostitute. If you were forced into it,” he said, before seeming skeptical about the same scenario applying to bestiality.

“Obviously, we are never going to hire the criminal,” Patel said, later joking “We have great canines.”

“So you disqualified the animal?” Kennedy asked, later adding “How do you involuntarily do [bestiality]?”

Patel said trafficking can involve all kinds of disturbing practices.

“In a lot of these cases, when human traffickers, who are some of the worst individuals on planet Earth, they don’t just traffic you for prostitution; they traffic you for degrading acts of all kinds, and they force you into that type of conduct,” he said at one point during the exchange.

“But you’re not telling us today that if a human being had sex with an animal, that they can still be an FBI agent,” Kennedy asked towards the end of his line of questioning.

“No,” Patel responded.


“I am not complicit.”

Hind Rajab, age six, graduating from kindergarten in Gaza, shortly before she was killed. To learn more, follow the link below.

“I am not complicit.”
–Ed Sheeran explaining why he had nothing to do with Macklemore being dropped from his tour.

I won’t here review all the stories of America and Israel in the past few years, particularly since Trump began his second term in January 2025 and Israel began its Gaza response to October 7 in 2023.

Instead, I will focus on the last few days in music. Ed Sheeran (Spotify’s #16 artist in the world with 81 million monthly listeners) is touring major venues. He added Macklemore to the tour. Sheeran agreed, as he does with all supporting acts, that Macklemore could choose his own setlist.

At the first tour stop, Macklemore unsurprisingly had something to say critical of Israel and supporting Palestine. He made a point of speaking directly to Jews in the audience:


“Criticism of Israel, criticism of apartheid, being against genocide in no way is a criticism of you. My message is for peace, love; for all human beings to be treated with dignity, respect and equality.”


Some venues pushed back against Macklemore’s comments. Macklemore was dropped from the tour. It took a day for Sheeran to finally respond:


“His contract is with the promoter, not with me.

“I am appalled by the conflict between Israel and Palestine. The suffering and pain caused on both sides is a human tragedy. There are too many wars across the world causing immeasurable pain, none of which should be tolerated.”

“I am not complicit. I have my personal views on this devastating conflict. Just because I choose not to speak publicly, it doesn’t mean I don’t have them, and it doesn’t mean I don’t care. Nor does it mean I don’t support causes in my own, personal way.”

“There is a reason I do not use my professional platform for politics — my audience includes young people, often children, of all backgrounds. Those who come to my shows do not expect a political forum.”


There is a lot to unpack.

It is conceivable that Sheeran could have taken an extreme stand, refused to go on with the tour unless Macklemore continued. This would have prompted a storm of multi-million-dollar litigation among Sheeran, Macklemore, promoter, venues, and many more (probably the Department of Justice would weigh in). This would have denied fans the enjoyment and denied tour employees the work. In so many ways not a great solution. Though had that happened, we might once again be talking about Gaza and Palestine, which is taking a back seat to other disasters, many made by the current American administration.

Even so, what Sheeran did say is mealy-mouthed at best.

“I am not complicit” echoes down the ages when morality is in question. “Yes, it may be wrong, but no, it’s not my place to do anything about it because I had nothing to do with in the first place.” If you are a student of history’s worst moments, you will recall this as the number one defense/excuse/explanation.

In past days, in coming days, in historical overview, we will see how often we hear some version of “I am not complicit.” So it goes.