Bob Schwartz

Netanyahu tells Trump to pick a side

There are thousands of people, from undergraduate students of foreign relations and political science to world class experts and statesmen, who know more about the complexities of Israel and the Middle East than the president. But we’ve got what we’ve got.

Most nations think that Israel is on a wrong path. Most Americans think Israel is on a wrong path. Most American Jews think Israel is on the wrong path.

On the other hand, the Israeli administration thinks it’s on the right path. Many, not all, American Republicans think Israel is on the right path. A major American lobbying group thinks Israel is on the right path, and puts it’s money where its position is.

Then there’s the president, who knows little and cares little for the complicated big picture. He generally sides with Israel, and thinks he can be known as the historic one who solved the Middle East. Quixotic hardly describes it. He is Don Quixote without a horse or an able assistant.

Netanyahu sees the president’s ignorance and uncertainty. So when the president came up with a 15-point peace plan, Israel found it unacceptable.

The official Israeli response was no, but the implicit response is: pick a side. If you, Mr President, try to lean even a little way away from unconditional support, we will unleash holy hell on the American political scene, and you will be caught up in it.

We appreciate that you and those loyal to you have been on our side. But you must have realized that once you are with us you are with us. That is precisely the standard you have set for your own  followers. If you are not with me, 100 percent, you are against me. I am saying the exact same thing. Pick a side.

The most petty president


There are a lot of adjectives we attach in describing people, some commonly, some not so much. The same applies to our description of the American president.

Watching his obsession with prosecuting a decent man, a former Olympian, for the made up crime of vandalizing the Reflecting Pool, brought another word to mind.

Petty. It doesn’t have the harsh power of so many other descriptions of the president. It is something we might toss at a friend or loved one, when they’ve made something big out of something that didn’t deserve it.

Many don’t consider the president a friend or loved one. Another difference is that with this obsession comes the power to prosecute and potentially jail a demonstrably innocent person, so innocent that the prosecutor dropped the bogus charge.

This is where petty becomes a useful word. Petty plus power is an apt description of one aspect of the situation, though far from the only one. Petty people with power are nothing new, but in every case contradict our basic sense of fairness. The legal system for one, since that is the topic here, is built to prevent unsupported pettiness, a very human trait, from having dire effect. That is the guardrail that keeps personal obsession and vengeance from becoming vendetta or policy.

The most petty president is also the most powerful person. An unfortunate combination.

5787: The Jewish Year of Compassion

Rachamim=Compassion

The upcoming Jewish New Year 5787, which begins with Rosh Hashanah on the evening of September 11, 2026, is declared the Jewish Year of Compassion.

This obviously has no formal or official effect. I have no position and very limited influence. It is just urging the Jewish communities to focus more on compassion this coming year.

I’ve posted regularly about the High Holidays. Here is a post from 2024:

Confession for the Jewish High Holidays 5785/2024

I have been reticent to publicly and widely express my views about the positions of Israel and Jewish communities on the current Israeli war on Gaza. Not that expressing divergent views is discouraged. But it is frequently the source of dispute with little movement. So my views have been expressed in small circles. I have posted about Gaza, urging support for extraordinary work of the International Rescue Committee, which seems to me humanely neutral.

By 2024, a year after the Gaza war began, I had a growing sense that more focus on compassion—great and unconditional compassion—might be beneficial. The 2024 post above was about a central part of the High Holidays liturgy: confession. Was I suggesting, obliquely, that among the matters that we confess on the holidays—we all have lots to confess—maybe the treatment of the Gazan people was one of them?

The point of the Declaration is to increase the Jewish focus on compassion. This is not in any way to suggest that compassion is not a significant element of the tradition or that the Jewish communities and their members are uncompassionate. The only point of the Declaration is to promote investigation this New Year, as communities and as people, into whether compassion has been conditioned and qualified in ways that subvert or contradict the most basic—the most central—principles of the tradition. Whether human compassion, not just God’s compassion, should play a greater role in the High Holidays and in Jewish policies and positions.

5787: The Jewish Year of Compassion

Heschel on Politicians

“I consider the heart of the problem of human existence is to fight against mendacity, against lying. I would like to use a word which may be too often used, but it’s still the most important word—and that is “honesty,” or “sincerity,” or “trust.””

“I am against the word “politician.” I have great respect for the word “statesman.” It’s very interesting, the word “statesman” is not used. “Politician” is used. “Statesman” is a great word….The task of a statesman is to be a leader, to be an educator, and not to cater to what people desire almost against their own interests. To be a leader.”


From an interview with Abraham Joshua Heschel at the University of Notre Dame in 1967, published in Moral Grandeur and Spiritual Audacity, essays by Heschel.

Q: Your esteem for religious colleagues is greater than your esteem for politicians. I think you once said that the most depressing word in the English language is “politician.” Politicians are necessary, aren’t they? Why disparage them?

A: No, I’m not against politicians in their vocation. I’m against politicians in their tactics. Against the very meaning, the semantic meaning of the word “politician.”

Now let me elaborate. It may take me two minutes to explain it to you. I consider the heart of the problem of human existence is to fight against mendacity, against lying. I would like to use a word which may be too often used, but it’s still the most important word—and that is “honesty,” or “sincerity,” or “trust.”

The tragedy of our time is, we don’t trust each other. The Golden Rule today is not “Love thy neighbor as thyself” but “Suspect thy neighbor as thyself.” We suspect all politicians because we know in advance they don’t mean what they say and they don’t say what they mean.

Q: Is that justified? That suspicion?

A: Ask the people in the country. You’re asking me? I’m only one citizen. I have only one vote.

If you go to the country and ask them, “What do you think of politicians?,” they’ll say a politician is a synonym for a person who is not necessarily truthful. Right? Do you mind my elegant way of speaking?

We have a type of politician today—I suppose we’ve always had, and I don’t want to identify anyone—who tells us that he is doing what the peoples want. And, in fact, that may be so. Of course, that doesn’t reach to the question of leadership. Should our leaders give us what we want, or is there some other role?

I think there is another role. By the way, I am against the word “politician.” I have great respect for the word “statesman.” It’s very interesting, the word “statesman” is not used. “Politician” is used. “Statesman” is a great word.

Now, about doing what the people want—I’ll tell you what the people want. One of the major inclinations in every human being is a desire to be deceived. Self-deception is a major disease.

Q: To be told what one wants to hear?

A: Yes. You want to be deceived.

The task of a statesman is to be a leader, to be an educator, and not to cater to what people desire almost against their own interests. To be a leader.

The great question of today is mendacity. We live in a world full of lies. And the tragedy that our young people—or maybe it’s good—the young people have discovered how many lies are uttered daily and every moment. They can’t stand it. If there’s anything they despise, it’s someone who is phony, false rhetoric. We call it “credibility gap”—what we mean really is lying.


Thomas Merton on Technology

“I am ambivalent about the benefits and effects of unstoppable technological progress. It is nearly a force of nature. Rain helps our plants to thrive, our food to grow, our rivers to flow, our thirst to be quenched. But it can also overwhelm and destroy, so that we seek shelter from it in a flood or hurricane. Still, I wouldn’t trade technology in, not all of it, not easily. I am just wary and watchful.”

This is from Thomas Merton’s journals. He lived as a monk in a handmade hermitage on the grounds of the Abbey of our Lady of Gethsemani in Kentucky. It is a tiny building that up until 1965 did not have electricity:


“At last the electric line is coming to my hermitage!”

Yesterday in the morning, when I went out for a breath of air before my novice conference, I saw men working on the hillside beyond the sheep barn. At last the electric line is coming to my hermitage! All day they were working on the holes, digging and blasting the rock with small charges, young men in yellow helmets, good, eager, hardworking guys with machines. I was glad of them and of American technology, pitching in to bring me light, as they would for any farmer in the district. It was good to feel part of this, which is not to be despised, but is admirable. (Which does not mean that I hold any brief for the excess of useless developments in technology.)

Thomas Merton Journals, February 16, 1965, V.206–7


 

Laugh at everyone—primarily at yourself

The best remedy is a sense of humor. Don’t take your self-centeredness so seriously. Undermine the whole process by laughing at yourself. Recognize the irony: “I want happiness so badly, but my self-cherishing just makes me suffer. Even though I know this, I still can’t abandon my attachment to this self!” It’s very funny, when you think about it. Life is full of irony. Samsara is full of irony. Mind is full of irony. So try to be witty enough to see and appreciate this irony. Laugh at all your contradictions, especially the contradiction between your intentions and your counterproductive ways of fulfilling them. There’s no point in being heavy-handed and feeling so serious about your self-importance. When your habits are so strong that your thoughts and feelings are beyond your control, what else can you do but laugh? Humor is very important in the process of dismantling the ego. Without humor, it’s hard to be a practitioner.
–Dzigar Kongtrul, The Intelligent Heart


In 1947, Readers Digest launched a popular humor column called Laughter, the Best Medicine, which is still running. Science has confirmed the positive effect of laughter, but it is only half a story.

Laughing at yourself is both a remedy, as Dzigar Kongtrul says, and an effect of a realization. It will help lighten up and get you to the realization of what the self—your self—actually is. Or is not. The more you realize that, the more people and things will seem funny.

“What’s so funny about _____?”, you say, pointing to some suffering and horror, yours or anybody or everybody else’s.

As a rhetorical question, that seems to make sense, since we can list circumstances and situations that defy the slightest bit of humor. But if you treat it as a real question in all situations, you might find out something about yourself. You might find, as Dzigar Kongtrul points out, that whatever you are planning or doing has no hope of making things better and easing your suffering. In fact it might be making your suffering worse. Not only might there be a better way, but if you take the right path not driven by your own thinking, you already know what that way is.

What If President Dennison Is Our National Karma? (2018)

Note: The immediately previous post explains who David Dennison was. This post, also from 2018, is more philosophical. The final line, “at least we will have the open-eyed, open-hearted hope of getting it right the next time”, can be seen as an ironic dagger. The point about karma, about reaping what we as Americans sow, eternally applies.


A man reaps what he sows.
Galatians 6:7

Karma: A term used to refer to the doctrine of action and its corresponding “ripening” or “fruition”, according to which virtuous deeds of body, speech, and mind produce happiness in the future (in this life or subsequent lives), while nonvirtuous deeds lead instead to suffering.
Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism

When I experience the presidency of David Dennison, I wonder how we got here. One answer that won’t go away is that it is the sum of everything we have done and are doing as an American society—or everything we haven’t done and aren’t doing.

This isn’t to say that we are somehow being punished for transgressions, or that socially and culturally we haven’t done some admirable and adaptive things. It is just to say that some elements (not picking on social media, just using it as an example) have the potential to take us down the wrong road, and that when you add up the elements with potential for future misdirection, and the choices we have made, maybe it should not be surprising that we woke up one day—literally—to discover that the most unlikely human being in the world was the leader of the most powerful nation in the world.

So maybe the best response is to look at every one of those elements and choices, and mindfully consider whether they might have played a part in getting to this point. That might not rid us of Dennison soon, or of our national karma, or of our weird political harvest, but at least we will have the open-eyed, open-hearted hope of getting it right the next time.

Why Trump Wanted to Be “David Dennison” in the Hush Money Agreement with Stormy Daniels (Hint: It Has to Do with Her Breasts) (2018)

Note: This is the first of two posts exhumed from the wayback about David Dennison. The other, which requires knowing who David Dennison was, is next.


Update: Following this post, I realized that “DD” are also the initials of Dirk Diggler. Diggler, the main character in the movie Boogie Nights (1997), is a well-endowed male porn star based on the famous porn actor John Holmes. So is the choice of “David Dennison” about a porn star’s breasts or about a porn star’s penis? Or both?

In the non-disclosure agreement signed by Stormy Daniels to keep quiet about her relationship with Trump, he used the name David Dennison. The signature line—which according to her new lawsuit he didn’t sign—doesn’t even have that fake name. All it says is “DD”.

Why David Dennison? The initials tell it all.

Stormy Daniels bra size, reported in the multiple sites that keep track of such things, is 34DD. This is Trump’s juvenile little joke. Get it? If you’re not laughing, that’s because nothing Trump does—including his attempted jokes—is a laughing matter. Just, as he would tweet, SAD!

David Dennison and Stormy Daniels

Contemplating randomness

“I am going to build a church someday. It will have a holy of holies and a holy of holy of holies, and in that ultimate box will be a random number table.”
Gregory Bateson

Randomness rules. Our attempts at order and control, intelligent or less so, benign or malignant, only go so far. Then randomness intervenes.

Good or bad, there it is. Which makes it worth contemplating, because maybe surprisingly, it turns out to be worth thinking about.

More and more, science has been humbled, realizing that any of its constructs don’t account for more and more observations. Order will only get you so far. Scientists didn’t need to apply all their hard-won expertise to realize that. As human beings they—we—already knew that, if we paid attention.

Please continue to do your best for the best by bringing some version of order to chaos. But be humble about it, not only aware of the limitations, but living in the limitations. Walk into Bateson’s church, into the holy of holies of holies of holies, and read that random number table. There you are.

Note: Randomness has plenty of practical applications. Lotteries can be found in the Bible. The I Ching has been reading random throws for millennia. If you are interested in exploring the practice of randomness, the options are many. Dice rolls, coin flips, etc. In digital times, a number of programs have been developed to generate as-close-to-true random numbers as possible. We can also turn to AI models to generate randomness, though they will tell you that for truer randomness, hardware-based applications come closer.

Goodbye Hourglass! Lucky Charms Adds Magical Unicorns! (2018)

As you’ll see below, I was pretty excited when General Mills added magical unicorns to Lucky Charms in 2018.

In 2018 they said the unicorns were “permanent”. Yeah, that’s what they told the hourglass. I just went back to check. Not only are the unicorns still in the box, but just this year General Mills offered a limited-time Marshmallows Only (no cereal) Lucky Charms–with JUMBO UNICORNS.

Back in 2018 I said that if there was ever a time for unicorns, that was it. I have to add in 2026, if there is ever a time for JUMBO UNICORNS, this is it.


Timeless magic that’s cosmically delicious!

From General Mills:

For the first time in 10 years, Lucky Charms is introducing a new and permanent marshmallow – the magical unicorn! The magically delicious brand tapped into the imagination and creativity of young minds to hand select the newest charm and the decision was unanimous.

“Our goal is to not only create a cereal that families and cereal fans will love and enjoy, but to inspire magical possibilities and help spark imagination and fun no matter what the age,” said Josh DeWitt, marketing manager of Lucky Charms. “That’s why, after 10 years, we decided to introduce a new charm with the help of the keepers of magic themselves – kids. They spoke, and after hearing their love for the magical unicorn, we listened.”

From magical and lucky to cool and colorful, both boys and girls agreed that these mythical creatures had timeless magic that was the perfect fit for the only truly magical marshmallow cereal. The new unicorn charm, which features hues of bright purples and blues, is the first-ever marshmallow to be inspired and created by kids.

With the entrance of the new magical charm, consumers will have to say goodbye to the hourglass marshmallow, which has been a staple in the magical line up for more than a decade. Lucky Charms marshmallow blend will continue to feature eight lucky charms including hearts, stars, horseshoes, clovers, blue moons, rainbows, red balloons and now magical unicorns.


The cosmic significance of this change can’t be overstated. The hourglass is the symbol of time, in all of its inevitably and finitude. That’s gone. The unicorn represents “timeless magic” and will “inspire magical possibilities and help spark imagination and fun.”

If there was ever a time for unicorns, at breakfast or whenever, this is it. Thanks General Mills!