Bob Schwartz

Passover + April Fools’ Day = The Fools of Chelm

The wise men of Chelm published a decree that if the nasty carp had refused to be drowned and was caught again, a special jail should be built for him, a pool where he would be kept prisoner for the rest of his life. The decree was printed in capital letters in the official gazette of Chelm and signed by Gronam Ox and his five sages—Treitel Fool, Sender Donkey, Shmendrick Numskull, Zeinvel Ninny, and Dopey Lekisch.
–Isaac Bashevis Singer

It is April Fools’ Day. Hard to remember, because every headline every day seems to be a joke, though it’s not.

Tonight is also the first evening of Passover.

Let us combine these by featuring again the legendary Fools of Chelm, a town of unprecedented idiots who thought themselves the wisest men ever.

The best modern version of these stories is by Isaac Bashevis Singer in his Stories for Children.

Any similarity to any of those in power who think themselves wise but are actually fools is not a coincidence. Maybe you’ve seen the Executive Orders signed by Gronam Ox, Treitel Fool, Sender Donkey, Shmendrick Numskull, Zeinvel Ninny, and Dopey Lekisch.

Happy Passover. Happy April Fools’ Day.


Fools of Chelm & the Stupid Carp

In Chelm, a city of fools, every housewife bought fish for the Sabbath. The rich bought large fish, the poor small ones. They were bought on Thursday, cut up, chopped, and made into gefilte fish on Friday, and eaten on the Sabbath.

One Thursday morning the door opened at the house of the community leader of Chelm, Gronam Ox, and Zeinvel Ninny entered, carrying a trough full of water. Inside was a large, live carp.

“What is this?” Gronam asked.

“A gift to you from the wise men of Chelm,” Zeinvel said. “This is the largest carp ever caught in the Lake of Chelm, and we all decided to give it to you as a token of appreciation for your great wisdom.”

“Thank you very much,” Gronam Ox replied. “My wife, Yente Pesha, will be delighted. She and I both love carp. I read in a book that eating the brain of a carp increases wisdom, and even though we in Chelm are immensely clever, a little improvement never hurts. But let me have a close look at him. I was told that a carp’s tail shows the size of his brain.”

Gronam Ox was known to be nearsighted, and when he bent down to the trough to better observe the carp’s tail, the carp did something that proved he was not as wise as Gronam thought. He lifted his tail and smacked Gronam across the face.

Gronam Ox was flabbergasted. “Something like this never happened to me before,” he exclaimed. “I cannot believe this carp was caught in the Chelm lake. A Chelm carp would know better.”

“He’s the meanest fish I ever saw in my life,” agreed Zeinvel Ninny.

Even though Chelm is a big city, news traveled quickly there. In no time at all the other wise men of Chelm arrived at the house of their leader, Gronam Ox. Treitel Fool came, and Sender Donkey, Shmendrick Numskull, and Dopey Lekisch. Gronam Ox was saying, “I’m not going to eat this fish on the Sabbath. This carp is a fool, and malicious to boot. If I eat him, I could become foolish instead of cleverer.”

“Then what shall I do with him?” asked Zeinvel Ninny.

Gronam Ox put a finger to his head as a sign that he was thinking hard. After a while he cried out, “No man or animal in Chelm should slap Gronam Ox. This fish should be punished.”

“What kind of punishment shall we give him?” asked Treitel Fool. “All fish are killed anyhow, and one cannot kill a fish twice.”

“He shouldn’t be killed like other fish,” Sender Donkey said. “He should die in a different way to show that no one can smack our beloved sage, Gronam Ox, and get away with it.”

“What kind of death?” wondered Shmendrick Numskull. “Shall we perhaps just imprison him?”

“There is no prison in Chelm for fish,” said Zeinvel Ninny. “And to build such a prison would take too long.”

“Maybe he should be hanged,” suggested Dopey Lekisch.

“How do you hang a carp?” Sender Donkey wanted to know. “A creature can be hanged only by its neck, but since a carp has no neck, how will you hang him?”

“My advice is that he should be thrown to the dogs alive,” said Treitel Fool.

“It’s no good,” Gronam Ox answered. “Our Chelm dogs are both smart and modest, but if they eat this carp, they may become as stupid and mean as he is.”

“So what should we do?” all the wise men asked.

“This case needs lengthy consideration,” Gronam Ox decided. “Let’s leave the carp in the trough and ponder the matter as long as is necessary. Being the wisest man in Chelm, I cannot afford to pass a sentence that will not be admired by all the Chelmites.”

“If the carp stays in the trough a long time, he may die,” Zeinvel Ninny, a former fish dealer, explained. “To keep him alive we must put him into a large tub, and the water has to be changed often. He must also be fed properly.”

“You are right, Zeinvel,” Gronam Ox told him. “Go and find the largest tub in Chelm and see to it that the carp is kept alive and healthy until the day of judgment. When I reach a decision, you will hear about it.”

Of course Gronam’s words were the law in Chelm. The five wise men went and found a large tub, filled it with fresh water, and put the criminal carp in it, together with some crumbs of bread, challah, and other tidbits a carp might like to eat. Shlemiel, Gronam’s bodyguard, was stationed at the tub to make sure that no greedy Chelmite wife would use the imprisoned carp for gefilte fish.

It just so happened that Gronam Ox had many other decisions to make and he kept postponing the sentence. The carp seemed not to be impatient. He ate, swam in the tub, became even fatter than he had been, not realizing that a severe sentence hung over his head. Shlemiel changed the water frequently, because he was told that if the carp died, this would be an act of contempt for Gronam Ox and for the Chelm Court of Justice. Yukel the water carrier made a few extra pennies every day by bringing water for the carp. Some of the Chelmites who were in opposition to Gronam Ox spread the gossip that Gronam just couldn’t find the right type of punishment for the carp and that he was waiting for the carp to die a natural death. But, as always, a great disappointment awaited them. One morning about half a year later, the sentence became known, and when it was known, Chelm was stunned. The carp had to be drowned.

Gronam Ox had thought up many clever sentences before, but never one as brilliant as this one. Even his enemies were amazed at this shrewd verdict. Drowning is just the kind of death suited to a spiteful carp with a large tail and a small brain.

That day the entire Chelm community gathered at the lake to see the sentence executed. The carp, which had become almost twice as big as he had been before, was brought to the lake in the wagon that carried the worst criminals to their death. The drummers drummed. Trumpets blared. The Chelmite executioner raised the heavy carp and threw it into the lake with a mighty splash.

A great cry rose from the Chelmites: “Down with the treacherous carp! Long live Gronam Ox! Hurrah!”

Gronam was lifted by his admirers and carried home with songs of praise. Some Chelmite girls showered him with flowers. Even Yente Pesha, his wife, who was often critical of Gronam and dared to call him fool, seemed impressed by Gronam’s high intelligence.

In Chelm, as everywhere else, there were envious people who found fault with everyone, and they began to say that there was no proof whatsoever that the carp really drowned. Why should a carp drown in lake water? they asked. While hundreds of innocent fish were killed every Friday, they said, that stupid carp lived in comfort for months on the taxpayers’ money and then was returned sound and healthy to the lake, where he is laughing at Chelm justice.

But only a few listened to these malicious words. They pointed out that months passed and the carp was never caught again, a sure sign that he was dead. It is true that the carp just might have decided to be careful and to avoid the fisherman’s net. But how can a foolish carp who slaps Gronam Ox have such wisdom?

Just the same, to be on the safe side, the wise men of Chelm published a decree that if the nasty carp had refused to be drowned and was caught again, a special jail should be built for him, a pool where he would be kept prisoner for the rest of his life.

The decree was printed in capital letters in the official gazette of Chelm and signed by Gronam Ox and his five sages—Treitel Fool, Sender Donkey, Shmendrick Numskull, Zeinvel Ninny, and Dopey Lekisch.

© 2021 by The Isaac Bashevis Singer Literary Trust


Trump is a Quaker. Why is he instigating so much global damage and death?

Above is the Penn Quaker mascot. That isn’t Trump in that costume, though we don’t know what other cosplay he dabbles in. You can tell it isn’t him because however silly this costume is, that Quaker is in good shape.

Trump brags about his successful student career at the Wharton School, claiming to have finished first in his class, though the University of Pennsylvania will neither confirm nor deny anything about his time there. What we know is that he arrived at Penn for his junior year, after two undistinguished years at Fordham, and is remembered for not being engaged in class and leaving for New York every weekend.

He is, however, a Quaker, as in the nickname for Penn students. William Penn was famously a Quaker, while Benjamin Franklin, credited as founder of the university, was famously not. The curious thing is that Trump loves Ben Franklin, recently putting up a statue of him in the former Rose Garden, probably because it is supposed to remind us that he is a stellar Penn grad (“the best student ever at Wharton”) and because Franklin is pictured on the $100 bill. However, Trump never mentions that he is a Quaker, perhaps because he doesn’t actually know that is the Penn nickname or because he really, really doesn’t like oatmeal. Or peace.

This Passover donate to the International Rescue Committee

Passover begins on the evening of April 1, 2026.

When people, especially children, suffer, it is our duty to help relieve that suffering in any way we can. People of all religious traditions or none can agree on this.

The International Rescue Committee is one of the most respected and responsible organizations in the world working on this:


The International Rescue Committee (IRC) helps people affected by humanitarian crises—including the climate crisis—to survive, recover and rebuild their lives.

Founded at the call of Albert Einstein in 1933, the IRC is now at work in over 50 crisis-affected countries as well as communities throughout Europe and the Americas.


As Jews, on Passover we recall how our storied ancestors suffered—under the hand of a wicked ruler, wandering in a desolate desert. As we have suffered and suffer still, how can we deny the suffering of others and fail to relieve it?

When the Israelites were starving in the desert, we are told that God provided manna:


In the desert the whole community grumbled against Moses and Aaron. The Israelites said to them, “If only we had died by the Lord’s hand in Egypt! There we sat around pots of meat and ate all the food we wanted, but you have brought us out into this desert to starve this entire assembly to death.” Then the Lord said to Moses, “I will rain down bread from heaven for you. The people are to go out each day and gather enough for that day. (Exodus 16:2-4)


We cannot wait for manna. It is up to you.

Please donate to International Rescue Committee. Chag Pesach sameach.

How would Claude end the war on Iran?

Q: Based on leadership across nations, strategies, distribution of national power and resources, ideologies and politics, how do we end the current war on Iran by the U.S. and Israel?


Claude:

This is a very serious, rapidly evolving conflict with enormous humanitarian stakes. Let me lay out the current situation honestly and then walk through what a realistic pathway to ending it looks like — across diplomacy, power dynamics, ideology, and leadership.

The War as It Stands Today (Day 32 — March 31, 2026)

The 2026 Iran war was initiated by the United States and Israel on February 28, 2026. The opening strikes killed Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and triggered hundreds of retaliatory missiles and thousands of drones from Iran across the region, leaving thousands dead and millions displaced.

The war came despite a near-breakthrough: just before strikes began, Oman’s foreign minister reported that Iran had agreed to never stockpile enriched uranium and to full IAEA verification. Peace was described as “within reach.” The US and Israel attacked anyway.

As of today, Secretary of State Rubio says US objectives will be achieved “in weeks, not months,” while Netanyahu says the war has achieved “more than half its aims.” Simultaneously, Trump has threatened to destroy Iran’s oil infrastructure if no deal is reached.

What Each Party Actually Wants

Understanding the war’s end requires understanding each actor’s real goals — which are not always stated honestly.

The United States (Trump administration): Stated objectives have shifted repeatedly — from pre-empting Iranian retaliation, to destroying missile capabilities, to preventing nuclear weapons, to securing oil resources, to regime change. The multiplicity of goals is itself a diplomatic obstacle; it’s hard to negotiate an end when the goalposts keep moving.

Israel: Israel’s UN Ambassador has said military operations will continue until Iran’s nuclear and missile capabilities are eliminated — a goal that goes well beyond what’s achievable by air power alone, and one that Israel explicitly says is separate from any US-Iran talks.

Iran: Analysts say Tehran wants to end the war on its own terms and establish enough deterrence to ensure the conflict does not resume once it ends. Many Iranians feel they are being “bombed toward a negotiation table” and are relying on missiles, drones, and military resolve rather than promises from Washington.

The Key Pathways to Ending It

  1. Diplomacy Through Neutral Intermediaries — The Most Viable Track
    The Oman channel that nearly produced a deal in February remains the most credible model. Foreign ministers from Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia have now held talks in Islamabad aimed at ending the war, with Pakistan offering to host meaningful negotiations in the coming days.

China’s top diplomat urged Iran that “talking is always better than fighting,” while French President Macron has urged Tehran to engage in good-faith negotiations.

For this to succeed:
• The US must present consistent, achievable terms — the current shifting of goalposts is the biggest structural obstacle to a deal.
• Iran needs a face-saving exit — any deal where Iran appears to have simply surrendered will be politically unsustainable for Tehran’s new leadership.
• Pakistan and Oman are the most trusted intermediaries and should be the primary conduit, not direct US-Iran talks, given the deep mutual distrust.

  1. The Leadership Variable — Iran’s New Supreme Leader
    Khamenei’s death has created a leadership vacuum that is both a risk and an opportunity. Iran’s new supreme leader is reportedly Khamenei’s son. A new leader, not personally invested in decades of confrontation, could be more pragmatic — but only if the US gives him political space to negotiate without looking like he’s capitulating to the country that killed his father.

    Reza Pahlavi (the exiled former crown prince) has publicly called for sparing civilian infrastructure, but his political legitimacy inside Iran is minimal. Backing him openly, as some US officials favor, would almost certainly unite Iranians against the US rather than fracture them.
  2. Economic and Energy Leverage — A Double-Edged Sword
    The war has halted flights in and out of the Middle East, led to massive shipping reroutes, and effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz. Gas prices in the US have eclipsed $4 a gallon, the highest since 2022.

This creates domestic US pressure on Trump to end the war quickly — which is actually one of the strongest levers for peace. The longer the Strait of Hormuz remains disrupted, the harder the economic pain becomes globally, including for US allies whose cooperation Washington needs.

Trump’s stated desire to “take the oil in Iran” is not a peace strategy — it is an escalation trigger that would require a full ground invasion and occupation with no historical precedent for success.

  1. Decoupling the US and Israeli Tracks
    One of the most important structural fixes: Israel has explicitly said it is not part of US-Iran talks and will continue strikes until nuclear and missile capabilities are eliminated — essentially an unlimited war aim. As long as Israel can veto any ceasefire by continuing to bomb independently, no US-Iran deal can hold.

A durable ceasefire requires the US to condition its own military support to Israel on Israeli participation in ceasefire terms. This is politically difficult for the Trump administration but is the most decisive lever Washington actually holds.

  1. The Lebanon/Hezbollah Dimension
    Iran has asserted that Lebanon must be included as part of a ceasefire deal, making any ceasefire conditional on an end to the 2026 Lebanon war against Hezbollah. This linkage is strategically significant — Iran is trying to prevent Israel from ending the Iran war while continuing a separate war against Hezbollah. Any comprehensive peace framework must address Lebanon simultaneously, not sequentially.
  2. The Role of China and Russia
    Russia is not a neutral party — Iran is reportedly receiving satellite intelligence from Russia’s spy satellite system to track US military assets. But Russia and China together represent the one coalition that could put serious pressure on both Iran (to accept terms) and the US (through economic and diplomatic costs). Neither country wants a destabilized Middle East that collapses oil markets or draws them into a wider conflict.

China in particular has enormous leverage: it is Iran’s largest oil customer, has deep Gulf Arab relationships, and has strong trade interests in keeping the Strait of Hormuz open. A Chinese-brokered framework — perhaps alongside Oman and Pakistan — is probably the most realistic path to a multilateral ceasefire architecture.

What a Realistic End Looks Like

A negotiated ceasefire — not a decisive military victory for either side — is the only realistic outcome. Here’s what it would likely need to include:
• Nuclear framework: A return to something like the IAEA verification deal Iran had agreed to in February, with robust inspections and enrichment caps. Iran gets sanctions relief in exchange.
• Missile limits: Some verifiable caps on long-range ballistic missile development — Iran’s biggest concession.
• Ceasefire in Lebanon: A simultaneous halt to Israel-Hezbollah fighting with international monitors.
• No regime change as a condition: Any deal that requires Iran to overthrow its own government is a non-starter and will prolong the war indefinitely.
• Iran’s sovereignty and reconstruction: International reconstruction support for Iran’s civilian infrastructure would be a necessary inducement and would also counter the narrative that the West only destroys.
• US forces posture: A credible US commitment not to pursue a ground invasion, which Iran fears even more than airstrikes.

The Hardest Truth

The war began after a near-deal was in hand. The Omani foreign minister had stated significant progress, with Iran willing to make concessions, but President Trump said he was “not thrilled” with the talks. That suggests the obstacle to peace is not Iranian intransigence — it is the gap between stated US war aims (nuclear deal) and unstated ones (regime change, oil access, political signaling).

Until the US clarifies and limits its own war objectives, no intermediary, no matter how skilled, can broker an end. The diplomatic machinery — Pakistan, Oman, China, France — is ready and willing. The political will in Washington is the missing variable.


Passover and Freud

Moses and the Ten Commandments

What does Freud want? He might not want people attending a Passover seder, offering prayers to a God who isn’t there. But things are not that simple.

Sigmund Freud was a Jew by birth, an atheist by belief. He abstracted and analyzed religion as a powerful manifestation of powerful forces at work. But near the end of his career, he considered whether there was something in God that was more than a mere reflection of psychic need and dynamics.

In his final book, Moses and Monotheism, he suggests that while there is no God, the positing of one had forced the Jews—and all who followed on that spiritual path—to think and act differently. The gift of the idea of God was the imperative to transcend instinct and old ways, to make new and positive sense of the insensible, and to act accordingly.

Those in the Jewish communities will retell some version of the Moses story this Passover. But only some of those will have completely read the biblical account in the Book of Exodus. Even fewer will have looked beyond the popular stories to see what generations of historians and commentators have to offer.

One of those who does have something to offer is Freud. In Moses and Monotheism, he made a jump, if not a giant leap. Here is part of what Freud wrote (emphasis added):


How we who have little belief envy those who are convinced of the existence of a Supreme Power, for whom the world holds no problems because He Himself has created all its institutions!…We can only regret it if certain experiences of life and observations of nature have made it impossible to accept the hypothesis of such a Supreme Being. As if the world had not enough problems, we are confronted with the task of finding out how those who have faith in a Divine Being could have acquired it, and whence this belief derives the enormous power that enables it to overwhelm Reason and Science.

. . .

Let us return to the more modest problem that has occupied us so far. We set out to explain whence comes the peculiar character of the Jewish people which in all probability is what has enabled that people to survive until today. We found that the man Moses created their character by giving to them a religion which heightened their self-confidence to such a degree that they believed themselves to be superior to all other peoples. They survived by keeping aloof from the others. Admixture of blood made little difference, since what kept them together was something ideal the possession they had in common of certain intellectual and emotional values. The Mosaic religion had this effect because (1) it allowed the people to share in the grandeur of its new conception of God, (2) because it maintained that the people had been “chosen” by this great God and was destined to enjoy the proofs of his special favor, and (3) because it forced upon the people a progress in spirituality which, significant enough in itself, further opened the way to respect for intellectual work and to further instinctual renunciations.

. . .

In a new transport of moral asceticism the Jews imposed on themselves constantly increasing instinctual renunciation, and thereby reached at least in doctrine and precepts ethical heights that had remained inaccessible to the other peoples of antiquity. Many Jews regard these aspirations as the second main characteristic, and the second great achievement, of their religion….

Sigmund Freud, Moses and Monotheism


It was this “respect for intellectual work” that Freud so appreciated. Freud may have seen himself as a sort of Moses, leading civilization from benighted antiquity to a new light and new heights. Just as religious innovation led Jews from the old ways to a new land, so he and psychoanalysis would lead to even further self-awareness and progress—without God, of course.

Whether or not you believe in God, Moses, or Freud, whether or not you will be sitting at a seder table this Passover, it can be a good time to consider old ways in a new light. According to Freud, the gifts of Moses are the tools to renounce instincts and move beyond mere legacy. If we are trapped as man or mankind, psychoanalysis and, yes, even a certain religious perspective might be able to liberate us.

Of course there is. Any retelling of our received stories can be subversive, if we are willing to investigate and recreate. In the passage above, Freud could not be clearer that for him the conventional belief in God stands in the way of reason and science. But he then begrudgingly admits that in the right circumstances, some good may and has come from it.

© 2025 Bob Schwartz

Trump: Iranian negotiators are “very different and ‘strange’”

Different and strange Iranian negotiator

In an attempt to explain why nothing is going well and everything is going wrong with his Iran War, including negotiations with Iran that aren’t actually happening, Trump wrote on Truth Social that the Iranian negotiators are “very different and ‘strange’”.

Even for an absurdist yet deadly powerful comic like Trump, this is a statement worth analyzing.

“Different” than whom?

“Strange” in what way?

Different than other Iranians he knows? Different than other negotiators, real or pretend, he has dealt with?

Stranger than what or whom? It is safe to say that nothing and no one around Trump is anything but strange.

Of course, it is possible that in Trump’s mind, which is already challenged and now more challenged by a war he started but can’t control, everything is different and strange. Which might be acceptable and survivable, except if it is the mind of someone capable of setting the world on fire. That would be different and strange.

Melania

Juan Peron became the strongman dictator of Argentina. The driving force that got him there was Eva Peron, a political and cultural figure unlike any in modern history. This inspired one of the great contemporary musicals.

Melania seems to lack many of the characteristics that made Evita so compelling and successful. But what if we have gotten this all wrong? What if Melania is the power behind the throne?

Something to think about as we await the next Melania movie. A New America? Maybe a musical?

Here is a sample of lyrics from A New Argentina, the showstopping number from Evita:


PERÓN
It’s annoying that we have to fight elections for our cause
The inconvenience, having to get a majority
If normal methods of persuasion fail to win us applause
There are other ways of establishing authority…

Then again, I could be foolish not to quit while I’m ahead
I can see me many miles away, inactive
Sipping cocktails on a terrace
Taking breakfast in bed
Sleeping easy
Doing crosswords
It’s attractive

EVA
Don’t think I don’t think like you
I often get those nightmares too
They always take some swallowing
Sometimes it’s very difficult to keep momentum
If it’s you that you are following
Don’t close doors
Keep an escape clause
Because we might lose the Big Apple
But would I have done what I did
If I hadn’t thought
If I hadn’t known, we would take the country


The Mad Dancers

The Mad Dancers


The Baal Shem Tov is the eighteenth-century founder of the Hasidic movement in Judaism. Jews and non-Jews who know the modern versions of the movement often don’t know much about its beginnings. Some of those contemporary manifestations may seem distant from the original spirit.

We have no writings by the Baal Shem Tov, so we rely on the records of his disciples, and on legends and stories that have come down the years—and that still have a remarkable power to inspire. Their authenticity is not in their being a verbatim record of what was said and what happened. Instead, they are an unmistakable reflection of a unique spiritual figure from any age or faith.

The Baal Shem Tov believed in and lived the direct experience of God everywhere in everything. Study and conventional piety took second place, which made him unpopular with the establishment, and would still today. He thought we should be outdoors in the trees, not indoors at the desks. Living in a divine state of optimism, joy and wonder was the ideal. People who live that way, of course, are remarkably hard to control.


The Mad Dancers

Already the voices of opponents were raised against the Baal Shem’s teaching, for many
rabbis could not understand his ways. Some said of him that he dishonored the Sabbath with singing and freedom, some said that his ways and the ways of those who followed him and called themselves Chassidim were truly the ways of madmen.

One of the scholars asked of the Baal Shem, “What of the learned rabbis who call this teaching false?”

The Baal Shem Tov replied, “Once, in a house, there was a wedding festival. The musicians sat in a corner and played upon their instruments, the guests danced to the music, and were merry, and the house was filled with joy. But a deaf man passed outside the house; he looked in through the window and saw the people whirling about the room, leaping, and throwing about their arms. ‘See how they fling themselves about! ‘ he cried, ‘it is a house filled with madmen! ‘ For he could not hear the music to which they danced.”

Meyer Levin, The Golden Mountain (1932)


No yesterday no tomorrow no today

I’ve been looking through boxes of old photos. Not just from our lifetime, but back to the days when our grandparents were younger, and their parents and families too.

I shared a photo with a friend I’ve known a long time. He appreciated it and wished me luck with the photo “rabbit hole”.

He’s right. It is easy to get lost in these images from the past.

One view of the philosophy of time comes from various Buddhist perspectives. From the eighth century Zen text, Xin Xin Ming/Trust in Mind:


Words!
The Way is beyond language
for in it there is
no yesterday
no tomorrow
no today


There is no yesterday, tomorrow, today. There is apparently yesterday, tomorrow, today. Are we attached to any of them? Are we liberated from any of them?

The TV series Mad Men is about a charming and successful man, advertising executive Don Draper, who is lost in time. He has adopted the identity of a dead man, buries his true past, is in the business of fooling people, including himself.

The final episode of the first season is called “The Wheel”. The client is Kodak, who has asked the firm to advertise their new slide projector, then called the Wheel, but ultimately becomes known, in the story and in the real world, as the Carousel.

The episode is considered one the greatest in TV history. The following scene is the penultimate moment.

Don comes up with a client pitch that involves slides from his own early family life, and a story that is clearly made up about his first boss in advertising. Do the photos represent the actual past, or just some elements of a more whole and complex past? Which is an illusion? Is there yesterday? Is there tomorrow?

Birds remind us when we upset the grace of living

This morning, like some other mornings, the bird songs are so plentiful and overwhelming that I try to identify the birds singing. Above is this morning’s roster.

What I learned was this: The birds remind us when we upset the grace of living. They do this by being in their own ways with their own songs the grace of living. As we are and can be.