America at 250: An alternative vision

Above is a famous painting in art history and the most iconic and revered image in France.
Eugène Delacroix painted Liberty Leading the People (La Liberté guidant le peuple) in 1830. It was inspired by the July Revolution of 1830, a three-day uprising that overthrew the repressive King Charles X. In 1839 it was deemed “too revolutionary” and removed from public view. It was acquired by the Louvre in 1874, where it is proudly and prominently displayed.
Here is another painting from roughly the same era, celebrating liberty, in a different nation thousands of miles from France. This is The Declaration of Independence (1817) by John Trumbull. The painting hangs in the U.S. Capitol.

The two are different in many ways.
Delacroix saw Liberty leading as an earthy woman. She is surrounded by fighters of all ages and classes. She is also surrounded by the carnage that the fight for liberty over repression can tragically engender. The style reflects the Romanticism that Delacroix helped introduce into art: passion in the service of history and truth.
Trumbull may have created the tableau (these signers were never all together), but he did not have to make up the character of the signers. Dozens of men, all well dressed, many of them prosperous, a number of them slave owners. The style is traditional, showing so little passion that these might as well be statues, not people. In fact, some of those signers were revolutionaries, promoters of liberty for (almost) all people, very passionate—much of the spirit, philosophy and passion learned from the French.
We are at the start of seeing the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence and the American Revolution distorted and used to remake American history and culture into something it was not and is not. It is up to everyone to learn and educate others that the vision of America in Trumbull’s painting was and is not all that liberty is about.
We should not and will not turn to the brutality of the French fight. But we must maintain the spirit of liberty that compels us to act, whether it is King Charles X, King George III, or whatever king we encounter.














