Bob Schwartz

What If President Dennison Is Our National Karma? (2018)

Note: The immediately previous post explains who David Dennison was. This post, also from 2018, is more philosophical. The final line, “at least we will have the open-eyed, open-hearted hope of getting it right the next time”, can be seen as an ironic dagger. The point about karma, about reaping what we as Americans sow, eternally applies.


A man reaps what he sows.
Galatians 6:7

Karma: A term used to refer to the doctrine of action and its corresponding “ripening” or “fruition”, according to which virtuous deeds of body, speech, and mind produce happiness in the future (in this life or subsequent lives), while nonvirtuous deeds lead instead to suffering.
Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism

When I experience the presidency of David Dennison, I wonder how we got here. One answer that won’t go away is that it is the sum of everything we have done and are doing as an American society—or everything we haven’t done and aren’t doing.

This isn’t to say that we are somehow being punished for transgressions, or that socially and culturally we haven’t done some admirable and adaptive things. It is just to say that some elements (not picking on social media, just using it as an example) have the potential to take us down the wrong road, and that when you add up the elements with potential for future misdirection, and the choices we have made, maybe it should not be surprising that we woke up one day—literally—to discover that the most unlikely human being in the world was the leader of the most powerful nation in the world.

So maybe the best response is to look at every one of those elements and choices, and mindfully consider whether they might have played a part in getting to this point. That might not rid us of Dennison soon, or of our national karma, or of our weird political harvest, but at least we will have the open-eyed, open-hearted hope of getting it right the next time.

Why Trump Wanted to Be “David Dennison” in the Hush Money Agreement with Stormy Daniels (Hint: It Has to Do with Her Breasts) (2018)

Note: This is the first of two posts exhumed from the wayback about David Dennison. The other, which requires knowing who David Dennison was, is next.


Update: Following this post, I realized that “DD” are also the initials of Dirk Diggler. Diggler, the main character in the movie Boogie Nights (1997), is a well-endowed male porn star based on the famous porn actor John Holmes. So is the choice of “David Dennison” about a porn star’s breasts or about a porn star’s penis? Or both?

In the non-disclosure agreement signed by Stormy Daniels to keep quiet about her relationship with Trump, he used the name David Dennison. The signature line—which according to her new lawsuit he didn’t sign—doesn’t even have that fake name. All it says is “DD”.

Why David Dennison? The initials tell it all.

Stormy Daniels bra size, reported in the multiple sites that keep track of such things, is 34DD. This is Trump’s juvenile little joke. Get it? If you’re not laughing, that’s because nothing Trump does—including his attempted jokes—is a laughing matter. Just, as he would tweet, SAD!

David Dennison and Stormy Daniels

Contemplating randomness

“I am going to build a church someday. It will have a holy of holies and a holy of holy of holies, and in that ultimate box will be a random number table.”
Gregory Bateson

Randomness rules. Our attempts at order and control, intelligent or less so, benign or malignant, only go so far. Then randomness intervenes.

Good or bad, there it is. Which makes it worth contemplating, because maybe surprisingly, it turns out to be worth thinking about.

More and more, science has been humbled, realizing that any of its constructs don’t account for more and more observations. Order will only get you so far. Scientists didn’t need to apply all their hard-won expertise to realize that. As human beings they—we—already knew that, if we paid attention.

Please continue to do your best for the best by bringing some version of order to chaos. But be humble about it, not only aware of the limitations, but living in the limitations. Walk into Bateson’s church, into the holy of holies of holies of holies, and read that random number table. There you are.

Note: Randomness has plenty of practical applications. Lotteries can be found in the Bible. The I Ching has been reading random throws for millennia. If you are interested in exploring the practice of randomness, the options are many. Dice rolls, coin flips, etc. In digital times, a number of programs have been developed to generate as-close-to-true random numbers as possible. We can also turn to AI models to generate randomness, though they will tell you that for truer randomness, hardware-based applications come closer.