There is an orchid plant in the corner of my office. When I bought it it was full of purple flowers. I cared for it without fuss, watered it when dry. As orchids will, it dropped the flowers a long time ago, while the plant continued growing. Being where it is I don’t pay close attention, even when watering. You might say mindlessly. This morning I looked more closely and saw not just a bunch of new buds but full orchid flowers. That is how it is.
The encounter in the White House was antisemitic….It was all there, in the Oval Office, in the shouting and in the interruptions, in the noises and in the silences. A courageous man seen as Jewish had to be brought down. When he said things that were simply true he was shouted down and called a propagandist. There was no acknowledgement of Zelens’kyi’s bravery in remaining in Kyiv. Timothy Snyder, Antisemitism in the Oval Office
His post today, Antisemitism in the Oval Office, is about the inherent antisemitism of the recent confrontation between Zelensky and Trump in the Oval Office. It is Snyder’s view, and the view of other experts, that this was a clear example of public antisemitism. By the President of the United States.
Please read the post in its entirety. A brief excerpt below.
The attempt to humiliate Volodymyr Zelens’kyi in the Oval Office a week ago was an American strategic collapse. It heralded a new constellation of disorderly powers, obsessed with resources, seizing what they can. Inside that new disaster is something old and familiar that we might prefer not to see: antisemitism. The encounter in the White House was antisemitic.
I am historian of the Holocaust. I was trained by a survivor. Jerzy Jedlicki was nine years old when the Germans invaded, and fourteen when he emerged from hiding in Warsaw, and a prominent Polish historian by the time we met. He talked to me about antisemitism for decades, from the time of the breakup of the Soviet Union until his death in 2018. The way that I reacted to the scene in the Oval Office, and how I have pondered and considered it since, have to do with my research, but also with him….
To conclude that the scene in the White House was antisemitic, one does not need to know anything further. It’s all right there: the demand for deference, the obsession with money, the claims of corruption and dishonesty, the encirclement, the loud voices, the bizarre grievances, the underlying sense that a Jewish person does not fit and must be expelled. The context was evocative enough, and nothing more is really needed: those historical markers of antisemitism; Zelens’kyi’s Jewish origins; the particular way he was treated by non-Jews.
American political parties have produced some great leaders and leadership. Also some less than great, terrible or even criminal leaders and leadership.
This is the most extreme political moment in American history. It may be an extreme that some Americans support and cheer, but for others of us, it is a lawful, constitutional and democratic disaster.
At the moment, of our two political parties, only the Democratic Party is not enabling that disaster. Yet up to the moment, the party has not stood up and stepped up, and is not offering much more than “help us retake Congress in 2026. Send money.”
Democrats retaking one or both houses of Congress in 2026 would provide some slowing of this downward slide. But it won’t stop it, because even if the Supreme Court reins in some of the executive actions, some of those actions will get through and stay in effect. Besides that, even if in 2026 and 2028 Democrats retake Congress and the White House, the mass of suffering will have happened, the mass of damage will have been done and will require—this may sound hyperbole but isn’t—rebuilding the republic.
All of which says that there must be action now to try to slow the devolution and degeneration. “Try” because even under the best circumstances, with Congress and the Supreme Court mostly on his side, overwhelming power resides in a twisted presidency.
So try we must. But try what? That’s where the Democratic Party has so far fallen short. Yes, electing not-Republicans is a necessary condition. Necessary but not sufficient. Electing Democrats in 2026 is not enough.
Americans need leadership that plans and organizes action that is not about the next election and not rhetorical. We will continue to wait for the Democrats to tell us what we should be doing—now, not next and not two years from now. So far, we haven’t seen or heard that.
Ringu Tulku Rinpoche is a Tibetan Buddhist master who belongs to the Kagyu tradition of Tibetan Buddhism. He was born in Eastern Tibet (Kham) and received extensive training in all schools of Tibetan Buddhism. He studied under many great masters including the 16th Karmapa and Dilgo Khyentse Rinpoche. He has a PhD in Buddhist studies and is known for his scholarly work.
He founded Bodhicharya, an international organization that coordinates his educational and humanitarian activities. He travels extensively, teaching meditation and Buddhist philosophy at centers around the world, and is respected for his ability to present traditional Buddhist teachings in a way that’s relevant to contemporary life.
Among the treasures recorded by k.d. lang is Hymns of the 49th Parallel, an album of covers of songs by her fellow Canadians—the artistry of Neil Young, Joni Mitchell, Leonard Cohen, and others. And of course k.d. herself.
This should give you a clue to just how important Canadians have been to popular music and other arts. If Canada was represented by just one of these extraordinary artists, it would be enough. Taken together (need I add The Band, The Guess Who, Arcade Fire, Celine Dion, Alanis Morrisette, The Weeknd, Shania Twain, Drake, Rush and more?) it is a banquet of music. (See Rolling Stone’s 50 Greatest Canadian Artists of All Time. No surprise that Joni is #1, Neil #2, Rush #3, Leonard #4. Okay, maybe I’d move Leonard Cohen up a notch, but that’s quibbling.)
Listening to just Canadian artists until this madness is over is asking too much. Listening to lots of Canadian artists, maybe having one Canada-only day each week, is not punishment and would be a joy.
Since I often include one video track in my music posts, I have a quandary. Look at the list above. Just the ones named add up to hundreds of tracks. So if I offer just one or two, that doesn’t take away from the mountain of song. O Canada!
If you didn’t vote in the last presidential election, but are very unhappy with the current administration, good news!
There is now a hybrid voting booth-time machine. You can now go back in time and actually vote in the last election, with a better chance that Trump does not win the presidency.
OF COURSE THERE IS NO HYBRID VOTING BOOTH-TIME MACHINE! THERE IS NO TIME MACHINE AT ALL!
Remember that next time you have the opportunity to vote but don’t.
Now I try hard not to become hysterical But I’m not sure if I am laughing or crying Brilliant Mistake, Elvis Costello
Brilliant Mistake (1986) by Elvis Costello, on his album King of America, meant something at the time that was not a commentary on this moment almost forty years later. It refers to something else.
And yet…the work of great artists can transcend its origins. That’s what art does.
Brilliant Mistake just seems so now. Plus, like so much Elvis, it is a great track.
He thought he was the King of America Where they pour Coca Cola just like vintage wine Now I try hard not to become hysterical But I’m not sure if I am laughing or crying I wish that I could push a button And talk in the past and not the present tense And watch this hurting feeling disappear Like it was common sense It was a fine idea at the time Now it’s a brilliant mistake Brilliant Mistake, Elvis Costello
Spring is different in the desert. It happens earlier, as does summer, and summer+. Plants that don’t look like they will exhale beauty amaze, like people who don’t look like they will exhale beauty amaze. The shadows of the spikes on the petals tell you something.
There are dozens of hand gestures used in the world, some with universal meaning, many with different meanings in different cultures.
Among those well-known in America and elsewhere are the peace gesture, the V of index and middle finger, and the power gesture, the raised fist.
I’ve been thinking that in troubling times, a common gesture might be a way to express shared resistance to that trouble and a positive attitude toward that trouble. In past crisis, that is a role played by the peace gesture.
My suggestion for this moment is the abhaya mudrā. As the descriptions below explain, its meanings include fearlessness, protection, refuge, benevolence, peace and more. All things we need now.
abhayamudrā. (Tibetan mi ’jigs pa’i phyag rgya; Chinese shiwuwei yin; Japanese semuiin; Korean simuoe in). In Sanskrit, “the gesture of fearlessness” or “gesture of protection”; also sometimes called the gesture of granting refuge. This gesture (mudrā) is typically formed with the palm of the right hand facing outward at shoulder height and the fingers pointing up, although both hands may simultaneously be raised in this posture in a double abhayamudrā. This gesture is associated with Śākyamuni Buddha immediately following his enlightenment, and standing buddha images will often be depicted with this mudrā, portraying a sense of the security, serenity, and compassion that derive from enlightenment. Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism
abhaya-mudrā (Sanskrit, gesture of fearlessness). Iconographic hand gesture (mudrā) whose purpose is to dispel fear and communicate protection, benevolence, and peace. Commonly found in representations of the Buddha and celestial Bodhisattvas, where the figure is usually depicted standing with the right arm bent, the palm raised and facing forwards, and the fingers joined. A Dictionary of Buddhism (Oxford)
THE PROTECTION GESTURE (Sanskrit abhaya-mudra; Tibetan mi-’jigs-pa’i phyag-rgya) The gesture of protection or fearlessness is also identified with the gesture of giving refuge, described below. The right ‘method’ hand usually makes this gesture, with the palm held outwards and the fingers extending upwards. Handbook of Tibetan Buddhist Symbols
Fearless mudra hand gesture or Abhayaprada Mudra yoga mudra hand gesture isolated on black background.;