Bob Schwartz

Category: Uncategorized

Trump Donation Game: $1 for each Trump campaign lie

During his presidency, Trump certifiably told at least 10,000 lies (look it up).

If it was a drinking game, a drink for each lie, that would have meant taking almost seven drinks a day on average over four years.

He’s told a lot of lies since then, and its increasing on the campaign trail. As usual, the lies range from the nonsensical to the disgusting. One he just repeated is that in Democratic states that allow abortions, the law allows not only abortion for the entire pregnancy but even allows the execution of newborns. As with many of the things he says, you might shout back at the screen in anger—not only because he says it, but because there are millions of supporters who believe it.

Don’t be angry when you hear these lies. Don’t drink every time you hear one. If you had taken seven drinks a day for the four years of the Trump presidency, you might not even be here. If you do it now, you might not make it through the campaign.

Instead, every time you hear or read a Trump lie, allocate a dollar donation to the Harris campaign for each lie, or more if you can afford. You can also include lies told by Vance, though as a relatively new and inept candidate, he is an amateur compared to Trump. That way, even as Trump continues to poison the public water, you can help detoxify it.

Roadrunner

We live with a lot of creatures in the desert. I am partial to coyotes, and I love to see lizards of various sizes skittering around. A few weeks ago, a lizard less than one inch long emerged from the kitchen drain when I started water in the sink. It was confused and wet, so I carried it outside, where it surely dried off quickly—and skittered away.

Roadrunners are special. They appear, naturally, on the roads, but also in yards, and often on our back deck (see above). They are considered good luck. Notice that their feet are X-shaped. This makes them hard to track, because we can’t tell from footprints whether they are coming or going.

Imagine if our feet were symmetrical and had toes on both ends. Anyone tracking us through the sand, mud or snow couldn’t tell whether we were coming or going.

We might or might not know whether we are coming or going. Roadrunners know whether they are coming or going. X marks the spot.

© 2024 by Bob Schwartz

If Kamala runs as a Trust Buster—like Teddy Roosevelt—she can win by a landslide

Teddy Roosevelt is one of the greatest presidents in American history. On many rankings, he appears in the top five, along with Washington, Lincoln and FDR.

It is hard to imagine, with the current version of the Republican Party, but as a Republican, TR was a committed and successful progressive leader. His most famous progressive cause was his opposition to growing American business monopolies, known then as trusts. TR was famous as the Trust Buster.

He was not opposed to big and successful businesses. As he said in a 1902 speech:


“Corporations that are handled honestly and fairly, so far from being an evil, are a natural business evolution and make for the general prosperity of our land. We do not wish to destroy corporations, but we do wish to make them subserve the public good.”

Remarks at the Music Hall in Cincinnati, Ohio
September 20, 1902


In her recent economic policy proposals, Kamala mentioned the fight against monopolistic practices, along with other initiatives. But making that fight a big centerpiece of her campaign, if explained in the most basic and understandable terms, could have huge popular appeal—among voters of all ideologies. She needs to be seen as a contemporary Trust Buster and, if successful, gets to be, like TR, seen as one of the great presidents.

There is a problem. I note not out of cynicism but realism that politicians of both parties are careful about coming down too hard on monopolies and oligopolies. Winning elections takes money, and by their nature, monopolies and their beneficiaries have a lot of it. A more level playing field might keep them rich, but maybe not as rich as before. They often expect the politicians to understand that situation, if the money is to keep flowing to campaigns.

The question is whether politicians can win enough elections, without monopoly donors, by convincing voters that restricting or breaking up the trusts will lead to better outcomes such as lower prices for those voters.

TR made the case. So can Kamala and Democrats, if they are confident in their own abilities to make that case, even if it means depending on voters and losing some corporate and billionaire support.

So Kamala and Democrats: Shout out about how you are planning to bust those trusts.

© 2024 by Bob Schwartz

Food for thought

Food for thought

Inspired by Chinul

Neither farmer
Nor grocer
Nor cook
Some of all.
Earth
To market
To kitchen
To table.
Is it nutritious?
How does it taste?

© 2024 by Bob Schwartz


Chinul (1158–1210). A Korean Sŏn monk of the Koryŏ period (918–1392) who worked to reform the monastic order and provide a rationale for Son practice. Observing that the commercialization of monastic activities (in the form of fortune-telling, services for paying clients, and so on) had brought many into the order for questionable motives, he sought to create a reform group called the ‘concentration and wisdom society’, which found a home when he established the Sŏngwang Temple on Mt. Chogye. At the same time, he concerned himself with theoretical issues relating to the controversy between *gradual and *sudden enlightenment, and the relationship between meditative experience and doctrinal/textual studies. In the former case, he adopted the typology of the Chinese Ch’an and Hua-yen master Tsung-mi (780–841), which advocated sudden enlightenment followed by a gradual deepening and cultivation as the norm. In order to serve this purpose, he proposed *meditation on *kōans as the best method of practice. As to the latter, he advised that Korean Son not follow the example of the more extreme trends towards rejection of scriptural and doctrinal study exhibited by Chinese Ch’an, but that it keep the two together as an integrated whole. He was particularly interested in incorporating the Hua-yen philosophy of the Chinese lay hermit Li T’ung-hsüan (635–730) into Son practice as its basis and rationale. Chinul produced many eminent and accomplished disciples, and is arguably one of the most influential monks in the history of Korean Buddhism.

Damien Keown, A Dictionary of Buddhism

Watering dead flowers

Watering dead flowers

For the Flower Lady

She said water the dead flowers
When the desert summer passes
They will come back in beauty.
Like in the Bible I said.
Water the dead flowers.

© 2024 by Bob Schwartz

Netanyahu and Trump bring out the worst in Jews, Americans and people

Above is Jimmy Carter. His presidency is seen by many as a mixed bag. His humanity was and is never in question. He is now 99 years old, and nobody in American history has had a more successful or shining post-presidency. As for his administration, he is a world leader who brokered a peace deal in the Middle East, a rare milestone.

Which is a segue to Benjamin Netanyahu, who spoke yesterday to Congress, at the invitation of Republican Speaker Johnson, a speech boycotted by many Democrats, a speech that resulted in a large and difficult protest by opponents of Israel’s Gaza war.

Netanyahu is a segue to Donald Trump, who Netanyahu desperately wants back in the White House, because Trump is his kind of president—corrupt, dangerously self-interested, inhumane, etc.—and because President Trump will allow, encourage and enable whatever scheme Netanyahu has to stay in office and avoid peace. Netanyahu correctly views Trump as his less smart but equally narcissistic but more powerful brother, one he can wrap around his finger.

Just as Trump has brought the worst out in many Americans, that is, the worst that was already there, Netanyahu has brought out the worst in some Jews. Nothing those Americans learn about who Trump is or what he has done or plans to do seems to bother them. Nothing those Jews learn about who Netanyahu is or what he has done or plans to do seems to bother them. Thus always with demagogues.

There are no easy answers, In America, we can elect Democrats for every office, from president on down, because Republicans who remain in the party are all in Trump’s thrall, whether or not that’s what is actually in their hearts and minds. For Jews, we can stand up for the humanity that Judaism in its best lights and moments represents, and which Netanyahu doesn’t.

While we are at it, consider Jimmy Carter as a role model. A man of genuine faith, a man whose life has been guided for 99 years by a calling of service. Those who think that either Trump or Netanyahu are people of genuine faith or are good role models can and will go on with that dangerous and devilish delusion. Some know better.

© 2024 by Bob Schwartz

Fire dance

Fire dance

For J

Grab the fire stick tight
And dance.
Fist inches
From the flame.
Who needs the hand
When the feet move
The body flows.
Alive.


If Biden loses, it will destroy him. Do his supporters think about that?

Nothing is certain in politics, until it is. It appears possible that Biden will insist on being the Democratic nominee for President. It appears possible that he will lose and Trump will become President again.

It is certain that if Biden loses, as defiant and stubborn as he seems now, it will psychically destroy him. While politicians are generally used to losing, and have to be resilient, the special circumstances here will defy resilience for him.

As much as he now says he would be okay as long as he did his best, he will know that he is responsible. Maybe he will convince himself, or supporters will claim, that none of the alternative candidates could have beaten Trump—an unprovable proposition. They may say that it was all the negative Democratic talk about Biden’s age and abilities that sabotaged his nomination.

But somewhere deep, in some moments of self-awareness, Biden will know that it could have been different. That had he gracefully stepped aside in early 2024, or in the summer of 2024 when his problems became more prominent, that the next generation of leading Democrats could have taken his place—and beaten Trump.

That fact would tarnish his legacy. It will be a lead, if not in the headline, of the historical record. Most of all, it will be a psychic wound that Biden will bear. And for a man whose public contribution has been so full, it will be a sad shame.

Why don’t his family and friends, why don’t his Democratic supporters who love him, think hard about that?

© 2024 by Bob Schwartz

Caves and mines

Caves and mines

Caves and mines laugh
Watching the greedy
Break spirits and backs.
Metals and minerals
Reflect and channel light
Colors that mesmerize and enslave.
Caves and mines
Free and outliving them all
Laugh.

© 2024 by Bob Schwartz

“You tell him. I don’t want to tell him.” How Biden is still holding on.

Ordinary Democratic voters are the only constituency consistently saying that Biden should drop out. But their voices are easily ignored.

Three other constituencies with loud and influential voices—Democratic leaders, Democratic donors, Democratic-leaning media—are currently more timid and quiet, with just occasional outbursts so far.

The unspoken mantra among them is “You tell him. I don’t want to tell him.” They hope and pray that the other one will make the case so insistently and persuasively that Biden will relent.

They need to break that standoff and end their public equivocation. They all have to join in a chorus of respectful reality. Otherwise, while each is waiting for the other to be the “bad guy”, Biden will remain defiant and deluded—and likely the losing Democratic candidate.

Please, Democratic leaders, donors and media, shout out. Now, because time is wasting. You have nothing to lose and a historic, existential election to win.