Bob Schwartz

Music: John Coltrane and Miles Davis

You like jazz. You don’t like jazz. You are allergic to jazz. You haven’t listened to enough or any jazz to know.

Not liking jazz is like not liking fruit. So many types, so many songs, so many performers and performances.

Here are a couple of tracks and a couple of artists that might get through to you. Both are from epochal albums by epochal artists, My Favorite Things (1960) by John Coltrane and Kind of Blue (1959) by Miles Davis.

With all respect, appreciation and affection for all the other genres I’ve spent millions of hours listening to, jazz is the most liberating. It does a lot of other things, as all the other genres can, but no other genre has so many artists trying to liberate themselves, which is why listening to it is also liberating.

It is not a coincidence that following the historic horror of World War I the Jazz Age was born. In the face of existential threat—or certainty—freedom was the theme. It isn’t the only music that reflects the possibility or the imperative of breaking free. But it is one that, if you’ve missed it, you shouldn’t miss.

John Coltrane, My Favorite Things from My Favorite Things (1960).

Coltrane took the saxophone where it had never been before. On this album, accompanied by other greats McCoy Tyner on piano and Elvin Jones on drums, he plays with standards from George Gershwin, Cole Porter, and this one from a Broadway musical, Rodgers and Hammerstein’s Sound of Music.

Miles Davis, Freddie Freeloader from Kind of Blue (1959).

Kind of Blue is a jazz milestone, for Davis and for the music. Here he is with Bill Evans on piano and John Coltrane and Cannonball Adderley on sax. Coltrane was for a time part of Davis’s ever-changing lineup of stars.


Epstein-era claims by young girls accusing Trump are “unsubstantiated”? That’s what trials are for.

Miss USA and Miss Teen USA, 1999

Non-lawyer Americans believe they have a trove of legal knowledge, based on thousands of hours of TV. Part of that hard-viewed learning should include this:

Many serious cases are based on differing versions. Sometimes there is direct evidence or just circumstantial evidence supporting one version or the other, but sometimes it comes down to she said/he said. If the claim is plausible, it will proceed to trial, and the credibility of the victim, and of the accused if he testifies, will be evaluated by the trier of fact, either a jury or a judge. A decision will be made. At trial.

The smokescreen that women (then girls) accusing Trump are making “unsubstantiated” claims does not resolve the matter. They have been justifiably scared to come forward for decades. When we see the roster of powerful men involved, not to mention the woman who did much of Epstein’s dirty work, it would be imprudent not be scared. One of those men in fact turned out to be arguably the most powerful man in the world, and still is.

DOJ should release every claim that was made against Trump, as they are legally required to do. Every claim should be investigated, just as claims revealed against other men are, some of whom may also claim that the accusations are “unsubstantiated”. Let Trump and his shills and sycophants repeat that each one of the claims is unsubstantiated or vindictive. And if the claims don’t ever go to trial, which they should, let all Americans be the trier of fact as to what actually happened. We now know all about Trump—too much sometimes—and we’ll be the judge.