Bob Schwartz

Disorganized speech and psychiatric conditions

In past posts I focused on the psychiatric conditions Antagonism and Narcissistic Personality Disorder and Antisocial Personality Disorder, both of which are described in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) from the American Psychiatric Association.

In recent months, frequent episodes of disorganized and incoherent public speech have been reported. Some claim that it is just an idiosyncratic personal style, while others attribute it to the possibility of more serious issues. Looking back to the disorders mentioned above, it is worth considering what this disorganized and incoherent speech might indicate.

Disorganized speech is associated with the condition of schizophrenia. But such speech patterns may be indicative of something else.

Disorganized speech can occur in several other psychiatric and medical conditions beyond schizophrenia that may be worth considering.

Other Psychotic Disorders:

  • Brief psychotic disorder
  • Schizophreniform disorder
  • Schizoaffective disorder
  • Delusional disorder (less commonly)
  • Substance/medication-induced psychotic disorder
  • Psychotic disorder due to another medical condition

Mood Disorders:

  • Bipolar disorder during manic or mixed episodes (flight of ideas, pressured speech)
  • Major depressive disorder with psychotic features
  • Severe depression (psychomotor retardation can affect speech organization)

Neurocognitive Disorders:

  • Dementia (Alzheimer’s, vascular, Lewy body, frontotemporal)
  • Delirium
  • Traumatic brain injury
  • Huntington’s disease
  • Parkinson’s disease (advanced stages)

Developmental and Neurodevelopmental Conditions:

  • Autism spectrum disorders (pragmatic language difficulties)
  • Intellectual disability
  • Specific language disorders
  • ADHD (in some cases, rapid or tangential speech)

Substance-Related:

  • Intoxication with stimulants, hallucinogens, or cannabis
  • Withdrawal from alcohol or sedatives
  • Chronic substance use effects

Medical Conditions:

  • Seizure disorders (particularly temporal lobe epilepsy)
  • Brain tumors
  • Stroke affecting language areas
  • Hyperthyroidism
  • Severe metabolic disturbances
  • Autoimmune encephalitis

Other Psychiatric Conditions:

  • Dissociative disorders
  • Severe anxiety disorders (circumstantial or tangential speech)
  • Personality disorders with psychotic features

The relationship between disorganized speech and Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) or antagonism is more complex and indirect.

Narcissistic Personality Disorder:
The DSM-5 doesn’t typically associate NPD with truly disorganized speech in the clinical sense. However, people with NPD may exhibit speech patterns that can appear disorganized or problematic:

  • Circumstantial speech – taking lengthy, roundabout paths to make points, often to showcase knowledge or importance
  • Tangential speech – going off on tangents, particularly when the topic shifts away from themselves
  • Grandiose or inflated language – using exaggerated or pompous speech that may seem disconnected from reality
  • Rapid topic changes when feeling criticized or when seeking to regain attention
  • Incoherent explanations when confronted with evidence that contradicts their self-image

Antagonism (as a personality trait):
Antagonism itself doesn’t directly cause disorganized speech, but highly antagonistic individuals might display:

  • Aggressive or hostile speech patterns that derail conversations
  • Manipulative communication that can seem illogical to others
  • Defensive rambling when challenged

Important Distinctions:

  • These speech patterns in NPD are typically motivated and goal-directed (even if maladaptive), unlike the genuinely disorganized speech in psychotic disorders
  • The person usually maintains logical connections in their thinking, even if their conclusions are distorted by narcissistic beliefs
  • Speech organization typically improves when the person feels secure or admired

When It Might Overlap:
True disorganized speech might occur in someone with NPD if they also have:

  • Comorbid psychotic features
  • Severe personality decompensation under extreme stress
  • Substance use
  • Underlying neurocognitive issues

Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD) is not typically associated with disorganized speech in the clinical sense described in the DSM-5. However, there are some nuanced considerations:

Typical Speech Patterns in ASPD:
People with ASPD generally maintain organized, coherent speech and often exhibit:

  • Superficial charm and articulate communication when it serves their purposes
  • Manipulative rhetoric that is actually quite organized and goal-directed
  • Smooth talking or “con artist” speech patterns
  • Logical presentation of lies or deceptions

When Speech Might Appear Disorganized:

  • Under interrogation or confrontation – may become evasive, contradictory, or rambling when caught in lies
  • During aggressive outbursts – speech may become rapid, hostile, and less organized
  • When intoxicated – substance use can affect speech organization
  • Fabricating complex lies – may create inconsistent or convoluted narratives

Comorbid Conditions:
True disorganized speech in someone with ASPD would more likely result from:

  • Comorbid substance use disorders (very common in ASPD)
  • Traumatic brain injury (higher rates in antisocial populations)
  • Comorbid psychotic disorders
  • Severe personality decompensation under extreme stress

Key Distinction:
The manipulative, deceptive, or aggressive speech patterns in ASPD are typically purposeful and organized at a cognitive level, even if they appear chaotic or contradictory to observers. The person usually maintains logical thinking processes, unlike the genuine thought disorganization seen in psychotic conditions.

Today is the 80th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima

Today, August 6, is the 80th anniversary of the atomic bombing of the Japanese city of Hiroshima by the U.S near the end of World War II. It is only one of the two times in history that a nuclear weapon has been used in war. The second time came three days later, when the U.S. bombed Nagasaki.

Japan was already losing the war. It surrendered about a month later. For eighty years the matter of whether dropping the first bomb, and then the second, was necessary to end the war. Some say that Japan would never have given up without it, and many American and Allied troops were saved. Others say that the destruction of the cities and the death of 160,000 civilians—and the health effects for many more—was unnecessary.

This anniversary did not make the front page or top story in news media, even in Japan. There are reports that the peaceful non-military attitude of Japan is receding. The bombed cities are rebuilt, the horror is distant, and giving peace a chance seems a luxury in this time and this world. As Kurt Vonnegut said in writing about his experience of the Allied bombing of another beautiful city, Dresden, in World War II: So it goes.

These times are not the first or last when we live through the calculus of horror. How much should we inflict? How much should we endorse? How much should we bear? Who is the enemy? Who and what should we follow? Who and what should we refuse?

Today is the 80th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, which is not on the front page or a top story. Maybe the calculus of horror should be.