Bob Schwartz

Americans who don’t like the vision of Trump America need a coherent vision of their own

Tens of millions of Americans have seen the vision of Trump America and don’t like it. It is a vision reflected in four years of Trump as president, four years as former president, four years coming as president again. It is also based on Trump serving with a majority in both houses of Congress and a majority sympathetic to him on the Supreme Court.

The first principle: The vision for those who don’t like the Trump vision is not simply a vision without Trump. The past election veered between no-Trump and assorted other pitches. It didn’t work.

The second principle: The Democratic Party—the only alternative in an immutable two-party system—is a valuable asset but does not seem capable of providing an actionable, effective and attractive vision. America would be far worse off without Democrats as a counterbalance. But being not-Republicans and not-Trump is not enough.

Effective and attractive leaders offering actionable strategies and vision will emerge. Eventually, sooner or later. But it cannot be stressed enough: not-this is not enough, and neither is retreading visions that will not work in these times, in this nation, for and with these people. Some principles are so basic—rule of law, for example—that they should be a part of any vision. But it is not enough.

As noted, Democrats are an essential element in a two-party system now dominated by Republicans. But the thought that if Democrats can just win a slim majority here or there, or at least reduce a Republican majority here or there, is not enough. It is not a vision.

If you discover some visionary leaders, or better yet if you are a visionary leader, come forward. Proverbs 29:18 says “Where there is no vision, the people perish.” Or the wrong vision prevails.

© 2025 by Bob Schwartz

Two Buddhist principles for learning anything: skillful means and testing teachings

Whatever your area of study and learning—not just religion, but science, business, arts, etc.—there are those who you want to learn from and those who want to teach you. Sometimes individually, sometimes institutionally.

You may keep in mind two Buddhist principles that apply universally: skillful means and testing teachings.

Skillful or expedient means—known in Sanskrit as upaya—suggests that at any point in a life, under any particular circumstances, one method of learning may be appropriate for an individual, but at another point under different circumstances, another method may be more appropriate.

Buddha was also very specific about how an individual can choose methods and teachings. In a sutra attributed to Buddha, he recommended testing teachings, and not simply accepting teachings from any teacher—not even himself:

Don’t accept what you hear by report, and don’t accept mere tradition. Don’t jump to conclusions based on assumptions. Don’t accept a statement just because it is found in scriptures, or on the basis of general acceptance, or because it is what your teacher says. After examination, only believe and act upon what you yourself have tested and found reasonable.
—Kalama Sutta

© 2025 by Bob Schwartz